December 23, 2010
Todays the final push to produce some data before the holidays!

I'll be running some qPCR assays on the hard clam cDNA samples from yesterday. Because I'm short on plate space I will only be doing qPCR assays from a single sampling group; BX, MA, and FL.

Assays Run:
Actin: normalizing gene
Serine protease inhibitor: the assay that I've been playing with this quarter. Preliminary data from Steven suggests that I could have interesting results in the FL samples.

Click here for Actin qPCR data file.

Click here for SPI qPCR data file.

Actin Standard Curve
external image QPX%20Actin%20Std.jpg

SPI Standard Curve

external image QPX%20SPI%20Std.jpg


Results!
external image SPI%20122310.jpg


December 22, 2010
Today I will be DNasing and RTing all of the samples that I will be using for gene expression for the Hard Clam QPX project. Nothing too special to report, just the final RNA concentrations of the DNased samples...

Master Mix
1x
50
MMLV 5x Buffer
5
250
dNTP
5
250
RT
1
50
Water
4
200

The Table below has the volumes of RNA and water used in the RT reaction to make 1ug total RNA/Rxn
Sample ID
ng/ul
ul RNA
ul H20
CA 4
162.95
6.1
2.9
CA 5 DNase
173.65
5.8
3.2
DNase CA 6
167.86
6.0
3.0
DNase CA 7
172.86
5.8
3.2
DNase CA 8
95.62
9.0
0.0
DNase CA 9
159.47
6.3
2.7
DNase CA 10
84.97
9.0
0.0
DNase MA 4
151.54
6.6
2.4
DNase MA 5
147.08
6.8
2.2
DNase MA 6
221.32
4.5
4.5
DNase MA 7
112.1
9.0
0.0
DNase MA 8
106.57
9.0
0.0
DNase MA 9
150.03
6.7
2.3
DNase MA 10
158.45
6.3
2.7
DNase BX 1-3
187.94
5.3
3.7
DNase BX 1-4
157.42
6.4
2.6
DNase BX 2-2
92.9
9.0
0.0
DNase BX 2-3
155.63
6.4
2.6
DNase BX 3-2
175.77
5.7
3.3
DNase BX 3-3
168.07
5.9
3.1
DNase BX 4-1
170.07
5.9
3.1
DNase BX 4-2
138.08
7.2
1.8
DNase MA 1-3
179.59
5.6
3.4
DNase MA 1-5
138.11
7.2
1.8
DNase MA 2-4
177.13
5.6
3.4
DNase MA 2-5
163.88
6.1
2.9
DNase MA 3-3
151.42
6.6
2.4
DNase MA 3-4
165.03
6.1
2.9
DNase MA 4-3
157.76
6.3
2.7
DNase MA 4-4
123.83
8.1
0.9
Max 4 DNase
172.32
5.8
3.2
Max 5 DNase
73.09
9.0
0.0
Max 6 DNase
44.17
9.0
0.0
Max 7 DNase
47.22
9.0
0.0
Max 8 DNase
45.37
9.0
0.0
Max 9 DNase
111.74
9.0
0.0
Max 10 DNase
73.46
9.0
0.0


DNase Treatment
Useing Ambion's DNA-free Turbo kit...
Combined 5ul of 10x reaction buffer with the RNA and Water volumes in the table below. Added 1ul DNase enzyme and incubated at 37 degrees C for 30min. Added. 5.5ul inactivation reagent. Incubate RT 2min. Spin 10k 1.5min. Transfer supt to a new tube and spec.

Note: MAX and FL samples were previously DNased here and here.

Sample ID
User ID
Date
Time
ng/ul
A260
A280
260/280
260/230
Constant
Cursor Pos.
Cursor abs.
340 raw
Dnase CA 4
Default
12/22/10
12:14 PM
162.95
4.074
2.08
1.96
1.43
40
230
2.847
0.035
Dnase CA 5
Default
12/22/10
12:15 PM
173.65
4.341
2.24
1.94
1.56
40
230
2.779
-0.003
DNase CA 6
Default
12/22/10
12:16 PM
167.86
4.197
2.142
1.96
1.43
40
230
2.939
0.024
DNase CA 7
Default
12/22/10
12:16 PM
172.86
4.322
2.216
1.95
1.46
40
230
2.96
-0.01
DNase CA 8
Default
12/22/10
12:17 PM
95.62
2.391
1.243
1.92
1.19
40
230
2.006
0.062
DNase CA 9
Default
12/22/10
12:17 PM
159.47
3.987
2.04
1.95
1.4
40
230
2.85
-0.007
DNase CA 10
Default
12/22/10
12:18 PM
84.97
2.124
1.101
1.93
1.45
40
230
1.468
0.001
DNase MA 4
Default
12/22/10
12:18 PM
151.54
3.788
1.962
1.93
1.66
40
230
2.284
0.021
DNase MA 5
Default
12/22/10
12:19 PM
147.08
3.677
1.948
1.89
1.85
40
230
1.988
-0.003
DNase MA 6
Default
12/22/10
12:19 PM
221.32
5.533
2.867
1.93
1.88
40
230
2.938
0.026
DNase MA 7
Default
12/22/10
12:20 PM
112.1
2.803
1.469
1.91
1.35
40
230
2.073
0.139
DNase MA 8
Default
12/22/10
12:20 PM
106.57
2.664
1.394
1.91
1.51
40
230
1.761
0.029
DNase MA 9
Default
12/22/10
12:21 PM
150.03
3.751
1.956
1.92
1.9
40
230
1.972
-0.007
DNase MA 10
Default
12/22/10
12:21 PM
158.45
3.961
2.065
1.92
1.82
40
230
2.179
0.011
DNase BX 1-3
Default
12/22/10
12:22 PM
187.94
4.698
2.481
1.89
1.89
40
230
2.482
-0.015
DNase BX 1-4
Default
12/22/10
12:23 PM
157.42
3.936
1.999
1.97
1.83
40
230
2.151
-0.004
DNase BX 2-2
Default
12/22/10
12:23 PM
92.9
2.322
1.202
1.93
1.62
40
230
1.431
-0.018
DNase BX 2-3
Default
12/22/10
12:24 PM
155.63
3.891
2.01
1.94
1.85
40
230
2.104
-0.009
DNase BX 3-2
Default
12/22/10
12:24 PM
175.77
4.394
2.363
1.86
1.85
40
230
2.37
-0.009
DNase BX 3-3
Default
12/22/10
12:25 PM
168.07
4.202
2.227
1.89
1.87
40
230
2.249
-0.015
DNase BX 4-1
Default
12/22/10
12:25 PM
170.07
4.252
2.262
1.88
1.42
40
230
2.989
0.258
DNase BX 4-2
Default
12/22/10
12:26 PM
138.08
3.452
1.847
1.87
1.41
40
230
2.446
0.203
DNase MA 1-3
Default
12/22/10
12:26 PM
179.59
4.49
2.306
1.95
1.85
40
230
2.431
-0.02
DNase MA 1-5
Default
12/22/10
12:27 PM
138.11
3.453
1.818
1.9
1.84
40
230
1.873
-0.01
DNase MA 2-4
Default
12/22/10
12:27 PM
177.13
4.428
2.27
1.95
1.75
40
230
2.526
-0.007
DNase MA 2-5
Default
12/22/10
12:28 PM
163.88
4.097
2.089
1.96
1.79
40
230
2.294
0.001
DNase MA 3-3
Default
12/22/10
12:28 PM
151.42
3.785
1.939
1.95
1.8
40
230
2.105
-0.009
DNase MA 3-4
Default
12/22/10
12:29 PM
165.03
4.126
2.142
1.93
1.77
40
230
2.337
-0.012
DNase MA 4-3
Default
12/22/10
12:29 PM
157.76
3.944
2.028
1.95
1.86
40
230
2.124
-0.017
DNase MA 4-4
Default
12/22/10
12:30 PM
123.83
3.096
1.67
1.85
1.82
40
230
1.7
-0.015



The table below has the volumes of RNA used in the DNase treatment so as not to exceel 10ug of total RNA/Rxn. The reported concentration in this table is the previously reported concentration BEFORE DNase treatment.
Sample ID
ng/ul
ul RNA
ul water
BX1-3
403.66
24.77
20.23
BX1-4
260.08
38.45
6.55
BX2-2
137.09
45.00
0.00
BX2-3
240.71
41.54
3.46
BX3-2
279.37
35.79
9.21
BX3-3
266.55
37.52
7.48
BX4-1
329.88
30.31
14.69
BX4-2
193.62
45.00
0.00
MA1-3
335.15
29.84
15.16
MA1-5
176.71
45.00
0.00
MA2-4
452.18
22.12
22.88
MA2-5
379.45
26.35
18.65
MA3-3
213.62
45.00
0.00
MA3-4
246.55
40.56
4.44
MA4-3
230.18
43.44
1.56
MA4-4
163.11
45.00
0.00
CA 4
256
39.06
5.94
CA 5
259
38.61
6.39
CA 6
302
33.11
11.89
CA 7
224
44.64
0.36
CA 8
130
45.00
0.00
CA 9
207
45.00
0.00
MA 4
719
13.91
31.09
MA 5
708
14.12
30.88
MA 6
350
28.57
16.43
MA 7
160
45.00
0.00
MA 8
155
45.00
0.00
MA 9
661
15.13
29.87
MA 10
573
17.45
27.55

121
45.00



December 15, 2010
M. mercanaria QPX gill challenege experiment continued from October 26, 2010

RNA extractions using TriReagent

Sample ID
User ID
Date
Time
ng/ul
A260
A280
260/280
260/230
Constant
Cursor Pos.
Cursor abs.
340 raw
SEA 1
Default
12/16/10
12:16 PM
30.15
0.754
0.477
1.58
0.25
40
230
3.034
0.029
SEA 2
Default
12/16/10
12:30 PM
911.87
22.797
11.597
1.97
1.89
40
230
12.077
0.438
SEA 3
Default
12/16/10
12:18 PM
785.72
19.643
9.88
1.99
1.82
40
230
10.81
0.019
S-1 1
Default
12/16/10
12:18 PM
70.85
1.771
1.064
1.66
0.46
40
230
3.83
0.026
S-1 2
Default
12/16/10
12:19 PM
583.63
14.591
7.497
1.95
1.76
40
230
8.275
0.298
S1-3
Default
12/16/10
12:31 PM
788.28
19.707
9.925
1.99
1.7
40
230
11.615
0.16
ATTC 1
Default
12/16/10
12:25 PM
133.97
3.349
1.704
1.97
1.25
40
230
2.672
-0.001
ATTC 2
Default
12/16/10
12:21 PM
239.9
5.997
3.177
1.89
0.98
40
230
6.102
0.066
ATTC 3
Default
12/16/10
12:22 PM
387.17
9.679
5.006
1.93
1.29
40
230
7.491
0.019
TD8-81 1
Default
12/16/10
12:25 PM
31.73
0.793
0.5
1.59
0.31
40
230
2.523
-0.008
TD8-81 2
Default
12/16/10
12:26 PM
596.38
14.91
7.74
1.93
1.62
40
230
9.216
0.367
TD8-81 3
Default
12/16/10
12:26 PM
312.45
7.811
4.024
1.94
1.57
40
230
4.979
0.743
BX1 Hemo
Default
12/16/10
12:27 PM
57.36
1.434
0.847
1.69
0.32
40
230
4.508
0.781
MA4 Hemo
Default
12/16/10
12:28 PM
144.83
3.621
2.038
1.78
0.58
40
230
6.282
1.337

Naming Scheme:
SEA 1 = RNA from seawater only
SEA 2 = RNA from gill tissue incubated in seawater
SEA 3 = RNA from water that had the gill tissue

S-1 1 = RNA from QPX strain SP-1 in seawater only
S-1 2 = RNA from Gill tissue challenged with SP-1
S-1 3 = RNA from seawater of Gill tissue challenge with SP-1

ATTC 1 = RNA from QPX strain ATTC 1 in seawater only
ATTC 2 = RNA from Gill tissue Challenged with ATTC
ATTC 3 = RNA from seawater of Gill tissue challenge with ATTC

TD8-81 1 = RNA from QPX strain TD8-81 in seawater only
TD8-81 2 = RNA from Gill tissue Challenged with TD8-81
TD8-81 3 = RNA from seawater of Gill tissue challenged with TD8-81

BX1 = Plated hemocyte RNA from clam BX1
MA4 = Plated hemocyte RNA from clam MA4


December 14, 2010
Testing Serine Protease Inhibitor qPCR primers on FL samples from December 13, 2010
The SPI primers were ones that I had made in class and were previously tested on a single sample. Results were a little inconclusive. While I sa expression, it was very low and did not give me an indication of how the assay was working.
In this experiment I am going to run replicates of a dilution curve to look for amplification levels in FL samples, optimal cDNA dilutions, CV between replicates, and efficiency of assay (aka are the dilutions linear).

Dilutions = 0, 1:5, 1:10, 1:50, 1:100, 1:500

Plate Map/Results

Well
Fluor
Content
Sample
C(t)
A01
FAM
Unkn
1
33.95
A02
FAM
Unkn
.2
36.49
A03
FAM
Unkn
.1
37.59
A04
FAM
Unkn
.02
38.91
A05
FAM
Unkn
.01

A06
FAM
Unkn
.002

A07
FAM
Unkn
NTC

A08
FAM
Unkn
Blank

A09
FAM
Unkn
Blank

A10
FAM
Unkn
Blank

A11
FAM
Unkn
Blank

A12
FAM
Unkn
Blank

B01
FAM
Unkn
1
33.80
B02
FAM
Unkn
.2
36.83
B03
FAM
Unkn
.1
38.09
B04
FAM
Unkn
.02
39.27
B05
FAM
Unkn
.01

B06
FAM
Unkn
.002

B07
FAM
Unkn
NTC

B08
FAM
Unkn
Blank

B09
FAM
Unkn
Blank

B10
FAM
Unkn
Blank

B11
FAM
Unkn
Blank

B12
FAM
Unkn
Blank


SPI_primer_test_dilution_graph.jpg

Conclusions:
1. Assay looks pretty good. R square of 0.97 is pretty tight although it would be nice if it was closer to .99 but the Ct values are getting pretty by the 1:10 dilution that this may not be possible for this set of concentrations.
2. SPI seems to be expressed in the samples, albeit at fairly low levels.
3. SPI was detected at 1:50 but was outside the linear range of the assay. 1:100 and 1:500 dilutions had no signal.
4. For future experiments I would run cDNA samples somewhere between their most concentrated form and a 1:5 dilution...maybe 1:2 is best to save on reagents.


December 13, 2010
WooHoo! back in the lab! and just shy under a month too!

RT reactions on FL samples DNAsed on November 17, 2010

Combined the following amounts of RNA with water to make 1ug RNA template in RT reactions

Sample ID
User ID
Date
Time
ng/ul
ul for 1ug
ul H2O
DNase FL1-3
Default
11/17/10
1:44 PM
169.83
5.89
3.11
DNase FL1-4
Default
11/17/10
1:44 PM
166.36
6.01
2.99
DNase FL1-5
Default
11/17/10
1:45 PM
158.92
6.29
2.71
DNase FL2-1
Default
11/17/10
1:46 PM
177.33
5.64
3.36
DNase FL2-2
Default
11/17/10
1:46 PM
167.56
5.97
3.03
DNase FL3-1
Default
11/17/10
1:47 PM
132.58
7.54
1.46
DNase FL3-2
Default
11/17/10
1:47 PM
71.8
13.93
0.00
DNase FL3-3
Default
11/17/10
1:48 PM
94.64
10.57
0.00

- Added 1ul OligoDT and Incubated at 70 degrees for 5min --ice immediately

Mastermix (10 samples)
5xM-MLV buffer: 50ul
dNTP: 50ul
M-MLV RT: 10ul
Water: 40ul

November 17, 2010
DNase treatment of FL samples from November 5 & 8

Combined the following volumes of RNA and Water based on concentration so as not to exceed 10ug RNA/45ul

Sample ID
ng/ul
ul RNA
ul Water
FL1-3
221.32
45
0
FL2-1
627.65
16
29
FL2-2
343.51
29
16
FL3-1
170.1
45
0
FL3-2
92.31
45
0
FL3-3
123.07
45
0
FL1-4
449.77
22
23
FL1-5
384.65
26
19

Added 5ul of 10x DNase Turbo buffer and 1ul DNAse Turbo
Incubate 37 degrees C for 30min
Add 5.5ul Inactivation reagent
Spin 10,000xg for 1.5min
Transfer supt. to new tube and spec.

Results:

Sample ID
User ID
Date
Time
ng/ul
A260
A280
260/280
260/230
Constant
Cursor Pos.
Cursor abs.
340 raw
DNase FL1-3
Default
11/17/10
1:44 PM
169.83
4.246
2.283
1.86
1.77
40
230
2.395
0.013
DNase FL1-4
Default
11/17/10
1:44 PM
166.36
4.159
2.153
1.93
1.78
40
230
2.338
0.028
DNase FL1-5
Default
11/17/10
1:45 PM
158.92
3.973
2.068
1.92
1.81
40
230
2.2
0.027
DNase FL2-1
Default
11/17/10
1:46 PM
177.33
4.433
2.341
1.89
1.85
40
230
2.394
0.031
DNase FL2-2
Default
11/17/10
1:46 PM
167.56
4.189
2.189
1.91
1.72
40
230
2.431
0.027
DNase FL3-1
Default
11/17/10
1:47 PM
132.58
3.314
1.71
1.94
1.35
40
230
2.447
0.176
DNase FL3-2
Default
11/17/10
1:47 PM
71.8
1.795
0.919
1.95
1.23
40
230
1.455
0.023
DNase FL3-3
Default
11/17/10
1:48 PM
94.64
2.366
1.247
1.9
1.26
40
230
1.881
0.088


November 9, 2010
And here is the final installment of the hard clam/QPX RNA extractions using TriReagent...


Sample ID
User ID
Date
Time
ng/ul
A260
A280
260/280
260/230
Constant
Cursor Pos.
Cursor abs.
340 raw
MA1-3
Default
11/9/10
11:48 AM
335.15
8.379
4.548
1.84
2.46
40
230
3.408
0.002
MA1-5
Default
11/9/10
11:49 AM
176.71
4.418
2.608
1.69
2.57
40
230
1.722
0.014
MA2-4
Default
11/9/10
11:49 AM
452.18
11.304
6.036
1.87
2.13
40
230
5.31
0.043
MA2-5
Default
11/9/10
11:50 AM
379.45
9.486
5.077
1.87
2.4
40
230
3.952
-0.057
MA3-3
Default
11/9/10
11:50 AM
213.62
5.341
2.96
1.8
2.48
40
230
2.154
0.027
MA3-4
Default
11/9/10
11:50 AM
246.55
6.164
3.514
1.75
2.52
40
230
2.449
0.011
MA4-3
Default
11/9/10
11:51 AM
230.18
5.754
3.172
1.81
2.51
40
230
2.29
0.013
MA4-4
Default
11/9/10
11:51 AM
163.11
4.078
2.344
1.74
2.62
40
230
1.554
0.012
BX1-3
Default
11/9/10
11:52 AM
403.66
10.092
5.618
1.8
2.3
40
230
4.395
0.017
BX1-4
Default
11/9/10
11:53 AM
260.08
6.502
3.516
1.85
2.39
40
230
2.725
0.021
BX2-3
Default
11/9/10
11:53 AM
240.71
6.018
3.428
1.76
2.43
40
230
2.477
0.016
BX3-3
Default
11/9/10
11:54 AM
266.55
6.664
3.73
1.79
2.38
40
230
2.803
0.012




November 8, 2010
More hard clam/QPX RNA extractions using TriReagent:


Sample ID
User ID
Date
Time
ng/ul
A260
A280
260/280
260/230
Constant
Cursor Pos.
Cursor abs.
340 raw
BX1-1
Default
11/8/10
2:20 PM
91.4
2.285
1.463
1.56
2.22
40
230
1.027
-0.007
BX1-2
Default
11/8/10
2:21 PM
65.54
1.639
0.978
1.67
1.82
40
230
0.9
0.023
BX2-1
Default
11/8/10
2:21 PM
94.22
2.355
1.406
1.68
1.89
40
230
1.247
0.022
BX2-2
Default
11/8/10
2:22 PM
137.09
3.427
1.957
1.75
1.98
40
230
1.733
0.022
BX3-1
Default
11/8/10
2:22 PM
46.78
1.17
0.714
1.64
1.72
40
230
0.678
0.065
BX3-2
Default
11/8/10
2:23 PM
279.37
6.984
4.041
1.73
2.22
40
230
3.142
0.02
BX4-1
Default
11/8/10
2:24 PM
329.88
8.247
4.541
1.82
1.53
40
230
5.373
0.672
BX4-2
Default
11/8/10
2:24 PM
193.62
4.841
2.73
1.77
1.57
40
230
3.083
0.388
FL1-4
Default
11/8/10
2:25 PM
449.77
11.244
6.223
1.81
2.18
40
230
5.157
0.049
FL1-5
Default
11/8/10
2:25 PM
384.65
9.616
5.318
1.81
2.25
40
230
4.275
0.046

Some of the 260/280 ratios are still a bit low. I think this is because, again, there was not a lot of gill tissues left in the tube from before and in order to get a good quality extraction I need to have a bit more. I think I will extract more samples from BX site 1 and one more from BX site 3. I will also extract new samples for MA, but this time I will extract NEW samples and not the second half of the remaining tissue from the previous extraction.


November 5, 2010

FL hard clam gill RNA extractions take 2:
Overview: So the reason for this do-over is that the RNA extractions from October 29, 2010 did not yield the quality of RNA I need to proceed with qPCR. The reasoning in my mind was that it was either my fault for not doing the extractions as continuously as I should have, or the sample quality is low and the RNA is already degraded. To find out the answer, I will be extracting a subset of the samples from that round extractions again. FL was chosen because they are most likely to have an immune response (judging from previous data) from which I can then test my SPI primers.

RNA-later RNA extraction protocol was carried out to a tee!

Sample ID
User ID
Date
Time
ng/ul
A260
A280
260/280
260/230
Constant
Cursor Pos.
Cursor abs.
340 raw
FL1-1
Default
11/5/10
2:09 PM
78.02
1.95
1.098
1.78
0.37
40
230
5.211
0.006
FL1-2
Default
11/5/10
2:09 PM
55.51
1.388
0.792
1.75
1.46
40
230
0.949
-0.002
FL1-3
Default
11/5/10
2:10 PM
221.32
5.533
3.022
1.83
2.12
40
230
2.611
0.01
FL2-1
Default
11/5/10
2:10 PM
627.65
15.691
8.167
1.92
2.06
40
230
7.634
0.158
FL2-2
Default
11/5/10
2:11 PM
343.51
8.588
4.513
1.9
1.97
40
230
4.37
0.048
FL3-1
Default
11/5/10
2:11 PM
170.1
4.253
2.189
1.94
1.45
40
230
2.942
0.25
FL3-2
Default
11/5/10
2:12 PM
92.31
2.308
1.243
1.86
1.39
40
230
1.659
0.019
FL3-3
Default
11/5/10
2:12 PM
123.07
3.077
1.609
1.91
1.52
40
230
2.024
0.17


RNA looks much much MUCH better! However, I think that both of my ideas for why the last round was so bad are both right/wrong. From these results, samples 1-1 and 1-2 are both moderate in that they have very low concentrations (they were also resuspended in 30ul of water instead of 75ul like the others) and their ratios are lower than other samples. These samples also had the smallest amount of tissue left in the tube!

Conclusion:
1. I should have extracted the other samples in smaller batches and to completion instead of breaking for classes, teaching, and other extractions.
2. I was not accustomed to working with gill tissue and it looks like you need more tissue than I thought and small amounts of tissue dont provide a robust amount of RNA.
3. I think I will pick two more FL samples from site one to replace 1-1 and 1-2.



Note to self: the following 3 entries are place holders with bullet points of what happened and need to be more completely written up...

November 1, 2010
I need to generate some cDNA from the hard clam samples so I can test my primers during Physiology lab tomorrow.

Promega Turbo DNA-free protocol:
1. Combine: 25ul RNA, 25ul sterile water, 5ul 10x Turbo DNase buffer, 1ul Turbo DNase
2. Incubate 37 degrees C 30min
3. Add 1ul Turbo DNase (rigorous protocol)
4. Incubate 37 degrees C 30min
5. Add 5.5ul DNase inactivation reagent.
6. Flick with finger to mix and incubate at RT for 2min
7. Spin 10,000g for 1.5min.
8. Move supt. to new tube.
9. Spec 2ul on nanodrop



Sample ID
User ID
Date
Time
ng/ul
A260
A280
260/280
260/230
Constant
Cursor Pos.
Cursor abs.
340 raw
Max 4 DNase
Default
11/1/10
1:00 PM
172.32
4.308
2.244
1.92
1.65
40
230
2.618
0.02
Max 5 DNase
Default
11/1/10
1:00 PM
73.09
1.827
0.997
1.83
1.22
40
230
1.499
-0.002
Max 6 DNase
Default
11/1/10
1:01 PM
44.17
1.104
0.618
1.79
1.02
40
230
1.087
-0.026
Max 7 DNase
Default
11/1/10
1:01 PM
47.22
1.181
0.673
1.75
0.79
40
230
1.489
0.065
Max 8 DNase
Default
11/1/10
1:02 PM
45.37
1.134
0.624
1.82
1.08
40
230
1.048
-0.012
Max 9 DNase
Default
11/1/10
1:02 PM
111.74
2.793
1.462
1.91
1.54
40
230
1.81
0.011
Max 10 DNase
Default
11/1/10
1:03 PM
73.46
1.837
0.977
1.88
1.28
40
230
1.437
0.056




RT Rxn. (MAX 4 only)
Note: only using one sample so I will have cDNA to use in class tomorrow. I will do a larger RT reaction later on all of the samples at the same time to control for master mix biases.
1. 5uL of DNase RNA (~1ug) was combined with 1uL oligo dT and 4uL nuclease free water in a 0.5ml PCR tube.
2. Sample was spun to collect contents at the bottom of the tube and then incubated at 70 degrees Celsius for 5min.
3. Sample was spun down again and kept on ice.
3. 5uL of M-MLV 5x reaction buffer, 5uL dNTPs, 1uL M-MLV RT (the reverse transcriptase), and 4uL of nuclease free water was added to the sample.
4. Sample was spun again and then placed in the thermocycler (42 degreesC for 60min followed by 70 degreesC for 3min).
5. Samples were spun down and stored on ice.





October 29, 2010
Spun down and resuspended RNA extractions from _DATE

Results: Not good

Sample ID
User ID
Date
Time
ng/ul
A260
A280
260/280
260/230
Constant
Cursor Pos.
Cursor abs.
340 raw
FL1-1
Default
10/29/10
10:39 AM
76.81
1.92
1.132
1.7
1.34
40
230
1.434
0.033
FL1-2
Default
10/29/10
10:40 AM
31.61
0.79
0.48
1.65
1.17
40
230
0.674
0.014
FL1-3
Default
10/29/10
10:40 AM
27.08
0.677
0.413
1.64
1.11
40
230
0.612
0.01
FL12-1
Default
10/29/10
10:41 AM
51.74
1.294
0.775
1.67
1.42
40
230
0.911
0.05
FL12-2
Default
10/29/10
10:42 AM
105.67
2.642
1.55
1.7
1.42
40
230
1.865
0.049
FL13-1
Default
10/29/10
10:43 AM
237.51
5.938
3.27
1.82
1.33
40
230
4.47
0.488
FL3-2
Default
10/29/10
10:44 AM
53.29
1.332
0.771
1.73
0.94
40
230
1.421
0.252
FL3-3
Default
10/29/10
10:44 AM
34.66
0.867
0.525
1.65
0.69
40
230
1.261
0.179
MA1-1
Default
10/29/10
10:45 AM
174.19
4.355
2.482
1.75
2.02
40
230
2.154
0.035
MA1-2
Default
10/29/10
10:45 AM
25.15
0.629
0.389
1.61
1.15
40
230
0.545
0.025
MA2-1
Default
10/29/10
10:46 AM
18.45
0.461
0.272
1.69
0.8
40
230
0.575
0.019
MA2-2
Default
10/29/10
10:46 AM
7.99
0.2
0.107
1.87
0.52
40
230
0.385
0.006
MA3-1
Default
10/29/10
10:47 AM
385.04
9.626
5.358
1.8
2.11
40
230
4.555
0.082
MA3-2
Default
10/29/10
10:47 AM
399.03
9.976
5.589
1.79
2.08
40
230
4.793
0.089
MA4-1
Default
10/29/10
10:48 AM
22.27
0.557
0.333
1.67
1.07
40
230
0.52
0.014
MA4-2
Default
10/29/10
10:48 AM
12.95
0.324
0.193
1.67
0.84
40
230
0.387
-0.004
BX1-1
Default
10/29/10
10:49 AM
33.71
0.843
0.511
1.65
1.23
40
230
0.687
0.017
BX1-2
Default
10/29/10
10:49 AM
25.28
0.632
0.375
1.69
1.15
40
230
0.551
0.004
BX2-1
Default
10/29/10
10:50 AM
68.16
1.704
0.963
1.77
1.47
40
230
1.156
0.036
BX2-2
Default
10/29/10
10:50 AM
78.96
1.974
1.192
1.66
1.62
40
230
1.219
0.152
BX3-1
Default
10/29/10
10:51 AM
16.89
0.422
0.24
1.76
0.92
40
230
0.46
0.016
BX3-2
Default
10/29/10
10:51 AM
167.42
4.186
2.721
1.54
1.35
40
230
3.109
0.544
BX4-1
Default
10/29/10
10:52 AM
431.15
10.779
5.966
1.81
1.6
40
230
6.727
0.648
BX4-2
Default
10/29/10
10:52 AM
199.28
4.982
2.807
1.77
1.67
40
230
2.977
0.264



For whatever reason, the RNA quality of these samples is very poor. Yield is low and 260/280 ratios are nowhere near the 1.8-2.0 range that I feel comfortable using as clean non-degraded RNA. Fortunately, I still have the second half of the tissue that I saved in RNA-later. The plan is to try extracting one sample set at a time (ie. FL only). One of my worries is that I was trying to extract too many samples at a time with too many other obligations and the protocol was not carried out as fluidly as necessary. The other option is that these samples were received in May (i think) and they were kept in the fridge until I extracted them so the RNA might not be properly preserved and/or they were not properly preserved to begin with.



October 27, 2010
Purification of hard clam hemocytes for RNA isolation

The purpose of this experiment is to isolate a large enough population of hemocytes for RNA extraction to make libraries.
-bled 6 individuals from each site (2-3ml total blood).
-immediately added 3ml seawater w/ pen/strep
-incubated o/n at 12 degrees
-washed 3x seawater w/ pen/strep
-added 3ml seawater w/ pen/strep and looked at the results:




external image MA4_17hr_102710_2.tif
Fig1. MA4 blood plated on polylysine plates at the 17hours. 20X magnification.
external image MA4_17hr_102710_2_40x%20CROP.jpg
Fig2. MA4 hemocytes plated on polylysine plates at 17hours. 40x magnification.


external image BX1_17hr_102710_20x.tif
Fig2. BFX1 blood plated on polylysine plates at 17 hours. 20X magnification


October 26, 2010
QPX M. mercenaria Gill tissue challenge

This is a Preliminary experiment to dissect gill tissue and then challenge it with QPX in a test tube and see if we can get any meaningful transcript data out of ti.
We are using three different strains of QPX, S-1, ATTC, and TD8-81, plus a control using just seawater w/o QPX.

Gill tissue from clam BFX 9 was used in all treatments.

Three treatments for each strain
1. QPX in seawater
2. Gill tissue exposed to QPX in seawater.
3. QPX in the presence of gill tissue (After challlenge is complete, Isolate QPX from the supernatent of treatment 2.)

Incubate 24hrs at 37 degrees Celsius.

Spin treatments 1 and 3 at 14k for 10 min to pellet QPX

Add 1ml of TriReagent to treatments 1 and 3, and 5ooml TriReagent to treatment 2 (easier to homogenize later).
Store at -80.


October 15,2010

More TriReagent RNA extractions of M. mercenaria gills from QPX samples (AUGUST/SEPTEMBER...)
Also measured of concentration for RNA samples purified on September 24, 2010
Note: These samples were stored as pellets in 75% ETOH at -80degrees. I spun the pellets down for 5min 12K and resuspended in 50uL DEPC treated water.
external image HardClam%20RNA%20101510.JPG




October 8, 2010

RNA extractions from pinto abalone larvae. Contiuned from OA treatment October 1, 2010

-For this extraction I am just going to see what kind of yield (both amount and quality) or RNA I can get from pinto abalone larvae. Since I've never done this before and have no idea how much RNA yield to expect, I will be extracting RNA from three different amounts of larvae.

Sample 1: 380pCO2 A
Sample 2: pooled 380pCO2 B&C
Sample 3: pooled 840pCO2 A,B,&C

All samples were taken form september 28, 2010. An individual sample should contain ~50 larvae, so the RNA extraction samples should contain 50, 100, and 150 larvae respectively.

Followed protocol for RNA extraction using TriReagent
Note: homogenized in 200uL before adding additional 800ul of trireagent.
Note: Larvae were stored in RNAlater and float to the top. I tried spinning for 10s at 14k and the larvae only moved partially down the solution. In the future I recommend NOT spinning and leaving the larvae collected at the surface while pipetting the RNAlater out from the bottom.



























Results!

























Sample ID
User ID
Date
Time
ng/ul
A260
A280
260/280
260/230
Constant
Cursor Pos.
Cursor abs.
340 raw
AbLarv 1
Default
10/8/10
1:18 PM
8.27
0.207
0.129
1.6
0.16
40
230
1.297
0.012
AbLarv 2
Default
10/8/10
1:19 PM
21
0.525
0.348
1.51
0.14
40
230
3.777
0.009
AbLarv 3
Default
10/8/10
1:20 PM
59.71
1.493
0.922
1.62
0.5
40
230
2.991
0.004


-I definitely got RNA, however it is not as clean as I would have hoped. My thought is that I was being a little bit too greedy when I was removing the upper phase after adding chloroform and may have sucked up some debris. I was not expecting this much RNA and wanted every last drop of that upper phase. I'm hoping that by doing this again and not coming as close to the interphase will help clean it up. I can also perform an additional EtOH wash to make sure.

-RNA concentrations are not as linear as expected considering the extractions should represent 50,100, and 150 larvae....in particular the "150" larvae sample is pretty high. This might be because these larvae came from a different treatment group or the jar contained a higher concentration of larvae. I have asked Liza for her larval counts from the samples that we took in parallel to these to get a better estimation of larval quantity.



October 5, 2010

Hard Clam QPX continued...

We will be doing RNA extractions during the Envirophys lab today, so instead of using some random tissue, I will be using some of the gill tissue from the QPX study....why not right?

Today I just prepared the samples by cutting the gill tissue in half as before, and storing it at -80 until next weeks lab to do the RNA extractions.


October 4, 2010

Abalone Antibiotic Challenge:
Note: This experiment is along the same lines as the differential centrifugation experiment with Percoll gradients in that we are trying to selectively isolate pure strains of rickettsia. In this case, we are going to try and utilize the differential antibiotic resistance properties of the three strains.

Approach:
4 treatments x 4reps per treatment.
Treatment 1: inject w/ saline solution (2% NaCl)
Treatment 2: inject w/ clarithromycin (previous resistance shown for "new" strain)
Treatment 3: inject w/ Rifampacin
Treatment 4: inject w/ Erythromycin

Animals:
~100 juvenal red abalone were "incubated" for several months (need to refer back to wetlab notebook for exact time) with 5 adult red abolone known to be infected with all three strains of rickettsia .

- 8 individuals were selected on (refer to histo notes for date) for histo sampling (head, foot, DG, PE). Body weight, shell weight, and shell length were also taken.
- All 8 individuals were positive for the new strain of rickettsia which is what we're most interested in, however, prevalence of the other two strains was varied.
- Refer to Histo notes 10:24-(1-8)

Antibiotic preparation:
Note: Stock concentrations were calculated based on the assumption that we will be injecting abalone with 50ul of solution. Antibiotics are not soluble in water, so a 10x solubilization solution is required. 1:10 dilutions were made by diluting 1ml 10x solution in 9ml 2%saline solutions. 7 aliquots were made (one for each day of the week) and frozen at -20.


Antibiotic
Dose
Stock
10x
Solubilize
Clarithromycin
20mg/kg
5.2mg/ml
52mg/ml
EtOH
Rifampacin
2mg/kg
0.52mg/ml
5.2mg/ml
MeOH
Erythromycin
15mg/kg
3.9mg/ml
39mg/ml
MeOH


- Concentration of stock solutions were calculated from average body weight taken from the 8 pre-sampled individuals:

#
TW
SW
BW
1
15.1
4.6
10.5
2
14.3
4.1
10.2
3
16.65
4.09
12.56
4
20.67
5.18
15.49
5
13.7
6.5
7.2
6
20.3
5.2
15.1
7
15.89
3.8
12.09
8
28.99
8.0
20.99
Avg BW = 13.02

Injections:
50ul injections will be preformed daily for 14 days.
This entry is a little bitter sweet because I was hoping to begin injections today but I cannot find clarithromycin. I know we had some when I last looked for it, but since then the fridge has been cleaned so I am assuming that it is sitting somewhere, very well organized, in a place I would never find it.

--ordered 100mg of clarithromycin


October 1, 2010


OA-Pinto abalone

The fine people at our Mukilteo station succeeded at spawning some pinto abalone and we were able to get a fairly generous number of larvae.

Approach x2:

1. Two OA treatments. 380ppm and 840ppm, 6 reps for each system.
2. Two care protocols for each treatment. Water changes everyday, water changes every other day. 3 reps for each system

-Abalone were spawned on 9/23/10 and were put in the OA systems on 9/27/10. Systems started out on a low flow rate to acclimate the larvae to new water and OA conditions.
- First day of sampling began on 9/28/10 and was terminated on 10/1/10

Treatment Breakdown:
380A-C: 380pCO2, H2O Change everyday
380D-F: 380pCO2, H2O Changed everyother day
840A-C: 840pCO2, H2O Change everyday
840D-F: 840pCO2, H2O Change everyday

What are we sampling?
50ml/jar for live/dead analysis
50ml/jar for RNA extraction
(concentration of larvae in the jars is ~1larvae/ml...so in theory, each tube should have 50 larvae)

Sampling Technique:
-Dunk filter up and down to dislodge any larvae that might be stuck to the 100micron screen.
-Use "plunger" to form homogenous mixture of larvae in the jar.
-Submerge 50ml falcon tube to collect sample.
-Samples were kept in cooler with icepacks for transport back to SAFS labs (samples were not "kept on ice" per se, just in a cool environment)

RNA preservation:
-On Days 1&2 of sampling, I had collected larvae in 50ml falcon tubes, brought them back to SAFS, spun them down for 1min, 1000rpm in a swing bucket rotor, sucked off the water, added RNAlater, and transferred to screw cap tube.

-Days 3&4 of sampling, I prefilled screw cap tubes with 1ml RNAlater and took these with me to NMFS. I still took samples using 50ml falcon tubes, except this time I immediately filtered the larvae through a submerged 100 micron filter and pipetted them out directly into the RNA later. I have yet to test the RNA from the two sampling methods but this one is much MUCH easier and I think that the sooner you can get the larvae into RNAlater the better.

-All RNAlater samples are currently being stored at 4 degrees. I hope to do some extractions within the next week, but if not they will be moved to -80degrees.

Sampling results:
-Larvae were beginning to settle by day 3 of sampling thus resulting in lower and lower concentrations of swimming larvae in our samples.
-On the last day of sampling we sampled as usual, but left the jars unhooked from the system for ~3hrs to allow any setting or dead larvae to sink to the bottom. This, hopefully, gave us a pure sample of swimming larvae higher up in the water column. Larvae were then siphoned and pooled from all 6 jars/treatment onto a 100 micron screen and preserved in RNA later. Once my RNA extraction protocol is worked out, this sample should hopefully serve as an RNA pool from a very late time point that can be used to generate a cDNA library.




September 24, 2010


Hard Clam QPX

Note: Sam has already generated some preliminary data on this project.
-Samples 1-3 from CA, MA, and MAX have already been extracted.

- I am going to continue w/ extractions and do a total of 10 samples of gill tissue from each site.
- To get started, I am only going to process a small number of samples since I will also be figuring out where everything is in the lab etc...
- I'll start by extracting RNA from gill tissue samples CA 4-9

RNA extraction using TriReagent:
1. Cut gill tissue in 1/2. Used one half for RNA extraction and placed the other half back at -80 degrees as a backup.
2. Add 300uL TriReagent
3. Homogenize with sterile blue pestle.
5. Incubate at RT for 5min
4. cf for 15', 12,000xg @ 4 degrees.
5. Transfer aqueus phase to new tube
6. Precipitate by adding 500ul Isopropanol
7. Incubate at RT 5min
8. Cf 12,000xg for 8min @ 4 degrees
9. Remove isopropanol and wash with 75% EtOH
10. Spin 5min 12,000xg @ 4 degrees
11. Remove EtOH and add 1ml fresh EtOH
Note: I saw a nice big white pellet so I am going to stop here and store the RNA as a pellet until the remaining samples have caught up to this point before going ahead and solubilizing the RNA for cDNA synthesis.
12. Store at -80 in EtOH as a pellet.




September 2, 2010

Exp: Rickettsia isolation by differential centrifugation:

-I am going to try using a Percoll solution to separate Rickettsia strains based on cell size.
-Why use Percoll? From articles I found using similar methods, Percoll seemed to be the easiest to use in that it forms a self forming gradient upon centrifugation and is also reported to maintain cell viability. This is important if the cell isolation is successful because we would then be able to inject healthy abalone with pure strains of live Rickettsia w/o having to culture the pathogen.

Trial 1:
*Made homogenization buffer: 0.33M Tris-Cl, 0.25M Sucrose

1. Dissect post esophagus from a single infected red abalone.
2. Homogenize in 3ml homogenization buffer w/ a Dounce homogenizer
3. Spin homogenate at 210xg (~1000rpm) for 10' to pellet cell debris
4. Remove supt. and layer it onto 27ml of 30% Percoll
30% Percoll = 9ml Percoll solution, 1ml 1.5M NaCl, 17ml H2O
5. Spin 25,000xg for 1hr
6. Take 1ml fractions and stain w/ hemastain kit.
Look

Results:
1. Differential centrifugation resulted in 4 distinct visual layers.
~5ml upper layer of clear liquid
~5ml middle layer opaque liquid
~1ml disctinct debris layer that was located ~10ml down the gradient...presumably the leading edge of the homogenate
~ remaining clear liquid
2. Cells only appeared in the 1ml "debris" layer
3. Difficult to distinguish rickettsia from everything else.

Future Exp: Repeat as before but spin Percoll gradient for 2hrs. Isolate "debris" layer, and spin again for 2-3hrs in a 40% percoll gradient.